
pmid: 15110443
This paper argues that thinking is assumed within nursing education. There are strategies to promote thinking: reflective practice, critical analysis and problem solving. I suggest that by categorising thinking into such boxes there may be a danger of limiting the rich possibilities of simply 'thinking'. The writings of Heidegger (1889-1976) are cited, highlighting the need to 'call' thinking, and to meditate or ponder on the things that matter. The paper comes from research that asked the question 'What calls for thinking in postgraduate education?' Findings reveal examples of teachers and students recalling 'thinking experiences' but also suggest there is a danger that students do not have time to think in a busy classroom situation. It appears that thinking is more likely to happen outside of the classroom, with peers, in assignment writing, or when thoughts simply come. The challenge to nursing education is that not only may teachers be limiting students thinking opportunities, but they may be directing thinking in a way that maintains the status quo. If nursing is to equip itself as a dynamic profession and take initiative for shaping its own future, then close attention must be paid to enabling thinking.
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Models, Educational, Existentialism, Attitude of Health Personnel, Teaching, Nursing Methodology Research, Focus Groups, Thinking, Nursing Education Research, Faculty, Nursing, Humans, Learning, Philosophy, Nursing, Students, Nursing, Models, Nursing, Education, Nursing, Nursing Process, New Zealand
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Models, Educational, Existentialism, Attitude of Health Personnel, Teaching, Nursing Methodology Research, Focus Groups, Thinking, Nursing Education Research, Faculty, Nursing, Humans, Learning, Philosophy, Nursing, Students, Nursing, Models, Nursing, Education, Nursing, Nursing Process, New Zealand
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
