
Abstract Thermal conduction networks formed by thermally conductive fillers are crucial to the thermal conductivity coefficients (λ) of composites. In this paper, paraffin wax (PW) spheres with different sizes are prepared by instantaneous cooling granulation technology. With graphite coated on their surface by the micro-cladding method, the graphite/PW thermally conductive composites are then fabricated by hot pressing. The formation process of graphite thermal conduction networks at interfaces between the PW phases, and the influences of the density, distribution, and integrity of the networks on the λ of the graphite/PW composites are analyzed in-depth. Besides, an innovative concept of “Density of Thermal Conduction Networks (DTCN)” is proposed to explain the λ difference among different graphite/PW composites. The DTCN of the graphite/PW composites have the best value for given graphite loading and molding pressure. The λ of the graphite/PW composites with the same size of PW spheres increases with increasing DTCN. When the amount of graphite is 10 wt%, the molding pressure is 200 MPa, and the PW spheres size is 2.08 ± 0.08 mm, the graphite/PW composites have the maximum λ (1.81 W/(m·K), the λ enhancement rate per unit mass fraction (Eλ/wt) of graphite is 45, about 6 times of that of pure PW (0.33 W/(m·K)), also obviously higher than that of the freely dispersed R-graphite/PW composites with the same amount of graphite and molding pressure (0.79 W/(m·K), Eλ/wt is 14). The higher DTCN, the more uniform distribution and integrity of the thermal conduction networks, and ultimately the higher λ of graphite/PW composites.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 85 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
