
pmid: 23827564
Gelatin from cold water fish skin was electrospun, crosslinked and investigated as a substrate for the adhesion and proliferation of cells. Gelatin was first dissolved in either water or concentrated acetic acid and both solutions were successfully electrospun. Cross-linking was achieved via three different routes: glutaraldehyde vapor, genipin and dehydrothermal treatment. Solution's properties (surface tension, electrical conductivity and viscosity) and scaffold's properties (chemical bonds, weight loss and fiber diameters) were measured. Cellular viability was analyzed culturing 3T3 fibroblasts plated on the scaffolds and grown up to 7 days. The cells were fixed and observed with SEM or stained for DNA and F-actin and observed with confocal microscopy. In all scaffolds, the cells attached and spread with varying degrees. The evaluation of cell viability showed proliferation of cells until confluence in scaffolds crosslinked by glutaraldehyde and genipin; however the rate of growth in genipin crosslinked scaffolds was slow, recovering only by day five. The results using the dehydrothermal treatment were the less satisfactory. Our results show that glutaraldehyde treated fish gelatin is the most suitable substrate, of the three studied, for fibroblast adhesion and proliferation.
Microscopy, Confocal, Tissue Engineering, Tissue Scaffolds, Cell Survival, Viscosity, Electric Conductivity, Fishes, 3T3 Cells, Fibroblasts, Solutions, Mice, Cross-Linking Reagents, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared, Animals, Gelatin, Surface Tension, Cell Shape
Microscopy, Confocal, Tissue Engineering, Tissue Scaffolds, Cell Survival, Viscosity, Electric Conductivity, Fishes, 3T3 Cells, Fibroblasts, Solutions, Mice, Cross-Linking Reagents, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared, Animals, Gelatin, Surface Tension, Cell Shape
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 86 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
