
pmid: 17855046
The concept of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) was proposed by Petersen et al. (1997, 1999) as a nosologic entity referring to elderly persons with mild cognitive deficit and without dementia. MCI is widely used in studies as an intermediate stage between cognitive normalcy and dementia. MCI now appears, however, to be a heterogeneous clinical entity. The many sources of heterogeneity that have been pointed out include: heterogeneity in etiological factors (various types of degenerative lesions, vascular risk factors, psychiatric features, concomitant non-neurological diseases), in clinical symptoms, and in clinical course (with decline, stable, or reversible cognitive impairment). New clinical criteria have thus been proposed for use in research and in clinical practice: 1) cognitive complaint from the patient, family, or both, 2) report by the subject or reporter of a decline in cognitive or functional performance, relative to previous abilities, 3) cognitive disorders evidenced by clinical evaluation: impairment in memory or another cognitive domain, 4) cognitive impairment without any repercussions on daily life, even if the subject reports difficulties concerning complex daily activities, and 5) no dementia. Those new criteria, essentially clinical, may be better adapted to both clinical research and daily clinical practice. Biological and radiological markers will provide greater and more systematic support for diagnosis in the near future, particularly for early detection of Alzheimer's disease.
Memory Disorders, Age Factors, Prognosis, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Diagnosis, Differential, Alzheimer Disease, Risk Factors, Activities of Daily Living, Humans, Dementia, Cognition Disorders, Mental Status Schedule, Forecasting
Memory Disorders, Age Factors, Prognosis, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Diagnosis, Differential, Alzheimer Disease, Risk Factors, Activities of Daily Living, Humans, Dementia, Cognition Disorders, Mental Status Schedule, Forecasting
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
