
pmid: 26462979
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether low fibrinogen levels (fibrinogen level <1.5 g/L) during catheter-directed thrombolysis are associated with an increased bleeding risk. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on patients undergoing extremity arterial or venous thrombolysis between 2005 and 2013. Results: Patients in the low fibrinogen group were younger ( P = .006) and had a higher number of venous occlusive events ( P = .004). The low fibrinogen group received a larger dose of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA; P = .009) and had a longer duration of thrombolysis ( P = .010). The rates of major bleeding were not significantly different ( P = .139). Univariate analysis showed that larger total dose and longer duration of tPA infusion were associated with increased bleeding complications ( P < .01 and P = .03). Conclusion: A fibrinogen level <1.5 g/L during thrombolysis was not associated with an increased bleeding risk. However, larger dose and longer duration of thrombolysis were associated with increased bleeding risk.
Male, Down-Regulation, Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Hemorrhage, Punctures, Risk Assessment, Fibrinolytic Agents, Risk Factors, Catheterization, Peripheral, Humans, Infusions, Intra-Arterial, Thrombolytic Therapy, Infusions, Intravenous, Retrospective Studies, Fibrinogen, Thrombosis, Treatment Outcome, Tissue Plasminogen Activator, Surgery, Female, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Biomarkers
Male, Down-Regulation, Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Hemorrhage, Punctures, Risk Assessment, Fibrinolytic Agents, Risk Factors, Catheterization, Peripheral, Humans, Infusions, Intra-Arterial, Thrombolytic Therapy, Infusions, Intravenous, Retrospective Studies, Fibrinogen, Thrombosis, Treatment Outcome, Tissue Plasminogen Activator, Surgery, Female, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Biomarkers
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
