
pmid: 22967953
Protein identification and proteome mapping mostly rely on the combination of tandem mass spectrometry and sequence database searching. Despite constant improvements achieved in instrumentation, search algorithms, and genome annotations, little effort has been invested in estimating the impact of different genome annotation releases on the final results of a proteome study. We have used a large dataset of mass spectra obtained using an Orbitrap LTQ XL instrument, covering different growth situations of the model species Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. More than one million spectra were analyzed employing the SEQUEST algorithm and four different databases corresponding to the major Chlamydomonas genome assemblies. In total more than 3000 proteins and about 11,000 peptides were identified. 238 proteins were exclusively detected in assembly 3.0 in contrast to 1222 missing proteins only detectable in other databases. The comparison of the results demonstrates that the database selection affects not only the number of identified proteins but also label free quantitation and the biological interpretation of the results. Lists of protein accessions exclusively assigned to individual C. reinhardtii genome assemblies and annotations are provided as a resource for proteogenomic studies.
Proteomics, 106037 Proteomik, Proteome, 106037 Proteomics, Molecular Sequence Annotation, Genomics, 106023 Molecular biology, 106023 Molekularbiologie, Databases, Protein, Algorithms, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Software
Proteomics, 106037 Proteomik, Proteome, 106037 Proteomics, Molecular Sequence Annotation, Genomics, 106023 Molecular biology, 106023 Molekularbiologie, Databases, Protein, Algorithms, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Software
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
