
arXiv: 1806.08304
Hypergraph categories have been rediscovered at least five times, under various names, including well-supported compact closed categories, dgs-monoidal categories, and dungeon categories. Perhaps the reason they keep being reinvented is two-fold: there are many applications---including to automata, databases, circuits, linear relations, graph rewriting, and belief propagation---and yet the standard definition is so involved and ornate as to be difficult to find in the literature. Indeed, a hypergraph category is, roughly speaking, a "symmetric monoidal category in which each object is equipped with the structure of a special commutative Frobenius monoid, satisfying certain coherence conditions". Fortunately, this description can be simplified a great deal: a hypergraph category is simply a "cospan-algebra". The goal of this paper is to remove the scare-quotes and make the previous statement precise. We prove two main theorems. First is a coherence theorem for hypergraph categories, which says that every hypergraph category is equivalent to an objectwise-free hypergraph category. Second, we prove that the category of objectwise-free hypergraph categories is equivalent to the category of cospan-algebras.
38 pages
FOS: Computer and information sciences, hypergraph categories, compact closed categories, Computer Science - Logic in Computer Science, Frobenius algebras, cospan, Mathematics - Category Theory, wiring diagram, Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO), Monoidal, symmetric monoidal and braided categories, FOS: Mathematics, Operads, Category Theory (math.CT), 18D10, 18D50
FOS: Computer and information sciences, hypergraph categories, compact closed categories, Computer Science - Logic in Computer Science, Frobenius algebras, cospan, Mathematics - Category Theory, wiring diagram, Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO), Monoidal, symmetric monoidal and braided categories, FOS: Mathematics, Operads, Category Theory (math.CT), 18D10, 18D50
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
