
pmid: 28822568
Stem cells from the apical papilla (SCAPs) were suggested as the stem cell source in regenerative endodontic procedures. However, bone and/or cementum-like structure were observed in root canals. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in infected root canals might alter SCAPs' osteogenic differentiation pattern. The objectives of this study were to investigate the effects of LPS on SCAPs' proliferation and osteogenic differentiation.The mesenchymal stem cell characteristics of SCAPs were confirmed. Cell viability was tested with Porphyromonas gingivalis LPS at concentration between 0.001 and 5 μg/mL. SCAPs were pretreated with those concentrations for 168 hours. Then SCAPs were further investigated for cell proliferation by resazurin-based assay. Mineralization capacity was determined by alizarin red S staining. Odontoblast marker was determined by DSPP gene expression. General bone and cementum markers, BSP and OPN, were also determined. Determination of the expression levels of these genes was performed by polymerase chain reaction.SCAPs demonstrated the mesenchymal stem cell characteristics. All LPS concentrations did not affect cell viability. Pretreatment with LPS also did not affect cell proliferation and mineralization in every concentration. There was no significant difference between DSPP and OPN gene expression levels at all concentrations. However, LPS at 5 μg/mL significantly increased BSP gene expression.Under the limitations of this in vitro study, LPS did not affect SCAP proliferation and mineralization. However, LPS at high concentration, 5 μg/mL, increased BSP gene expression.
Lipopolysaccharides, Tooth Apex, Osteogenesis, Stem Cells, Humans, Cell Differentiation, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Dental Papilla, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Cell Proliferation
Lipopolysaccharides, Tooth Apex, Osteogenesis, Stem Cells, Humans, Cell Differentiation, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Dental Papilla, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Cell Proliferation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 30 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
