
pmid: 21993763
The signal response measured in diffusion tensor imaging is subject to detrimental influences caused by noise. Noise fields arise due to various contributions such as thermal and physiological noise and sources related to the hardware imperfection. As a result, diffusion tensors estimated by different linear and non-linear least squares methods in absence of a proper noise correction tend to be substantially corrupted. In this work, we propose an advanced tensor estimation approach based on the least median squares method of the robust statistics. Both constrained and non-constrained versions of the method are considered. The performance of the developed algorithm is compared to that of the conventional least squares method and of the alternative robust methods proposed in the literature. Two examples of simulated diffusion attenuations and experimental in vivo diffusion data sets were used as a basis for comparison. The robust algorithms were shown to be advantageous compared to the least squares method in the cases where elimination of the outliers is desirable. Additionally, the constraints were applied in order to prevent generation of the non-positive definite tensors and reduce related artefacts in the maps of fractional anisotropy. The developed method can potentially be exploited also by other MR techniques where a robust regression or outlier localisation is required.
Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Nonlinear Dynamics, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Computer Simulation, Least-Squares Analysis, Signal-To-Noise Ratio, Image Enhancement, Algorithms
Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Nonlinear Dynamics, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Computer Simulation, Least-Squares Analysis, Signal-To-Noise Ratio, Image Enhancement, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
