<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
The interrelations between (upper and lower) Minkowski contents and (upper and lower) surface area based contents (S-contents) as well as between their associated dimensions have recently been investigated for general sets in R^d (cf. [3]). While the upper dimensions always coincide and the upper contents are bounded by each other, the bounds obtained in [3] suggest that there is much more flexibility for the lower contents and dimensions. We show that this is indeed the case. There are sets whose lower S-dimension is strictly smaller than their lower Minkowski dimension. More precisely, given two numbers s, m with 0 < s < m < 1, we construct sets in R^d with lower S-dimension s+d-1 and lower Minkowski dimension m+d-1. In particular, these sets are used to demonstrate that the inequalities obtained in [3] regarding the general relation of these two dimensions are best possible.
13 pages
Box dimension, S-dimension, 28A75, 28A80, Cantor set, Applied Mathematics, Surface area, Fractal string, Parallel set, Metric Geometry (math.MG), Mathematics - Metric Geometry, Mathematics - Classical Analysis and ODEs, Minkowski dimension, Minkowski content, Product set, Classical Analysis and ODEs (math.CA), FOS: Mathematics, S-content, Analysis
Box dimension, S-dimension, 28A75, 28A80, Cantor set, Applied Mathematics, Surface area, Fractal string, Parallel set, Metric Geometry (math.MG), Mathematics - Metric Geometry, Mathematics - Classical Analysis and ODEs, Minkowski dimension, Minkowski content, Product set, Classical Analysis and ODEs (math.CA), FOS: Mathematics, S-content, Analysis
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |