
pmid: 17223234
Cost effectiveness is an important factor to consider when choosing between various hand surgical interventions. Health utility measures can be used to determine cost effectiveness. The SF-6D is a health utility index derived from 11 items of the SF-36 quality of life questionnaire; values range from 0.296 to 1.0 (“perfect” health). We evaluated the validity of the SF-6D in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) who completed the SF-36 and the CTS symptom severity and functional status questionnaire before and 3 months after carpal tunnel release. Complete responses to the SF-6D items were available for 100 patients at baseline and 95 patients at baseline and follow-up. The mean SF-6D health utility index was 0.69 (SD 0.13) before surgery and 0.77 (SD 0.13) after surgery (moderate effect size). The SF-6D could discriminate between patient groups differing in self-rated global health and in whether, or not, they had a minimal clinically important improvement in CTS symptom severity after surgery. The SF-6D appears to be a valid measure of health utilities in patients with CTS and can be used in cost effectiveness studies.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Severity of Illness Index, Surveys and Questionnaires, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Preoperative Care, Quality of Life, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Female, Postoperative Period, Prospective Studies, Aged
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Severity of Illness Index, Surveys and Questionnaires, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Preoperative Care, Quality of Life, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Female, Postoperative Period, Prospective Studies, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
