
Dromedary (Camelus dromedarius) and Bactrian (Camelus bactrianus) camels are close species and their hybrids fertile, but until now no comparative data on the nutrient composition of their meat has been available. Six muscle samples were collected from nine Bactrians and 10 dromedaries from Kazakhstan and the Sultanate of Oman, respectively. They were used for amino-acid pattern determination. The essential amino-acid index was higher for all muscles in the dromedary meat than in Bactrian meat with a mean value of 216.9 and 191.6, respectively, which is high compared to other red meats. The between-muscle variability was higher in dromedary than in Bactrian meat and was more important than the between-species variability. However, the two species were well discriminated on the second factor of the linear factorial discriminant analysis with 93.14% well-classed meat based on 7 discriminant amino-acid including 4 essential ones. The Bactrian camel meat was richer in proline and leucine and the dromedary camel meat in serine, tyrosine, histidine, threonine and arginine. In spite of these differences, both meats were characterized by their richness in methionine and leucine. Consequently, the dromedary and Bactrian meats could provide an excellent source of high-quality proteins for human consumers.
viande, muscle, valeur nutritive, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5003, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_46ac6187, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_439, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5345, protéine animale, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4292, composition des aliments, Q04 - Composition des produits alimentaires, Camelus bactrianus, L01 - Élevage - Considérations générales, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_342, méthionine, dromadaire, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5278, acide aminé, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4669, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10467, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_11952, leucine, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4787, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10961
viande, muscle, valeur nutritive, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5003, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_46ac6187, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_439, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5345, protéine animale, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4292, composition des aliments, Q04 - Composition des produits alimentaires, Camelus bactrianus, L01 - Élevage - Considérations générales, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_342, méthionine, dromadaire, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5278, acide aminé, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4669, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10467, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_11952, leucine, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4787, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10961
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
