
The independence polynomial of a simple graph \(G\) is \(\sum_A x^{| A| }\), summed over independent vertex sets \(A\subseteq V(G)\). \textit{O. J. Heilman} and \textit{E. H. Lieb} [Commun. Math. Phys. 25, 190-232 (1972; Zbl 0228.05131)], erratum [Commun. Math. Phys. 27, 166 (1972; Zbl 0238.05114)] proved that all the roots of the independence polynomial of a line graph are real. (This property does not hold for all graphs, namely a claw, i.e. \(K_{1,3}\), is a counterexample.) Y. O. Hamidoune and R. P. Stanley conjectured that the independence polynomials of clawfree graphs (i.e. those without an induced \(K_{1,3}\)) have only real roots. This is an extension of the cited result of O. J. Heilman and E. H. Lieb, as line graphs are clawfree. The paper under review proves this conjecture. A key ingredient of the proof is a new lemma about polynomials with real coefficients. A sequence of polynomials \(f_1,f_2,\dots,f_k\) are said to be compatible, if for all \(c_1,c_2,\dots,c_k\) nonnegative real numbers, \(\sum_{i=1}^k c_if_i\) has only real roots. The lemma asserts that if \(f_1,f_2,\dots,f_k\) are pairwise compatible polynomials, all with positive leading coefficients, then they are compatible.
real roots, Clawfree graphs, Independence polynomial, clawfree graphs, Roots, Real polynomials: location of zeros, Theoretical Computer Science, Vertex subsets with special properties (dominating sets, independent sets, cliques, etc.), Computational Theory and Mathematics, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, independence polynomial
real roots, Clawfree graphs, Independence polynomial, clawfree graphs, Roots, Real polynomials: location of zeros, Theoretical Computer Science, Vertex subsets with special properties (dominating sets, independent sets, cliques, etc.), Computational Theory and Mathematics, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, independence polynomial
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 123 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
