Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Cleaner P...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Cleaner Production
Article . 2019 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Energy and carbon budgeting of tillage for environmentally clean and resilient soil health of rice-maize cropping system

Authors: B. Lal; Priyanka Gautam; A.K. Nayak; B.B. Panda; P. Bihari; R. Tripathi; M. Shahid; +4 Authors

Energy and carbon budgeting of tillage for environmentally clean and resilient soil health of rice-maize cropping system

Abstract

Abstract Human interventions in the environment leading to higher green house gas emissions which are degrading the soil and environment quality. Traditional/conventional tillage systems following since inception and residue burning are accelerating the degradation of soil and environment leading to food insecurity. The present study was executed to evaluate energy budgeting, carbon foot prints, gaseous emission and soil health under conservation tillage with residue retention for identifying cleaner production technology in rice-maize system. The novelty of the study is that it examines the integrated effect of tillage, residue retention through mulching on GHG emission along with soil health, energy consumption and carbon footprints together as conservation effective measure for sustainable and clean agricultural production. Zero tillage reduced the energy consumption by 56% and carbon footprints by 39% and besides that N2O emission was 20% lower than conventional tillage. Apart from clean environment, soil health was also improved by adoption of zero tillage in terms of NPK status, labile pool of carbon and enzymatic activities; the population of all the microbiota was increased, which was around 21.3, 51.2 and 27.6% higher in bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes. Crop residue retention as residue mulching (rice straw) significantly improved the crop productivity, microbial biota and enzymatic activities of soil, but it increased the energy consumption and carbon footprints by around 10%. N2O emission was also enhanced by residue mulching, and higher the quantity of residue used as mulch, more was emission. Although in initial years some yield penalty (10–15%) was recorded but in long run zero tillage can be a step towards sustainability as it can be a valuable approach for resilient soil health and cleaner production of maize in rice–maize system.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    121
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
121
Top 1%
Top 10%
Top 1%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!