
The academy of Nutrition and Dietetics completed an online Nutrition Informatics Survey in February of 2011. This survey builds on the first Nutrition Informatics Survey completed in 2008 (1) and has enabled the Academy to begin a longitudinal analysis of member trends in the use of technology, information management, and the use of the Nutrition Care Process and the International Dietetics and Nutrition Terminology. The online survey was developed by the Academy Nutrition Informatics Committee with the support of the Health Information Management Systems Society (HIMSS). A total of 3,342 individuals responded to the survey, and it included both active members and students. The 2011 Nutrition Informatics Survey demonstrates that members of the Academy are adopting and using technology and beginning to reap the benefits of improved information access and management. An increasing number of Academy members now practice full-time in the area of biomedical and/or nutrition informatics. The survey was designed to assess changes in the adoption and use of technology and to gauge differences in how members are accessing and using data and information, including the use of the Nutrition Care Process (NCP) and International Dietetics and Nutrition Terminology (IDNT). The survey also addressed the roles registered dietitians play in their organizations related to the selection, implementation, and maintenance of information management systems and other technology.
Adult, Male, Dietetics, Data Collection, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Humans, Female, Medical Informatics Applications, Medical Informatics
Adult, Male, Dietetics, Data Collection, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Humans, Female, Medical Informatics Applications, Medical Informatics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
