
Dynapenia, low muscle strength, is predictive for negative health outcomes and is usually expressed as handgrip strength (HGS). Whether HGS can be a proxy for overall muscle strength and whether this depends on age and health status is controversial. This study assessed the agreement between HGS and knee extension strength (KES) in populations differing in age and health status.Data were retrieved from 5 cohorts.Community, geriatric outpatient clinics, and a hospital. Five cohorts (960 individuals, 49.8% male) encompassing healthy young and older individuals, geriatric outpatients, and older individuals post hip fracture were included.HGS and KES were measured according to the protocol of each cohort. Pearson correlation was performed to analyze the association between HGS and KES, stratified by sex. HGS and KES were standardized into sex-specific z scores. The agreement between standardized HGS and standardized KES at population level and individual level were assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis.Pearson correlation coefficients were low in healthy young (male: 0.36 to 0.45, female: 0.45) and healthy older individuals (male: 0.35 to 0.37, female: 0.44), and moderate in geriatric outpatients (male and female: 0.54) and older individuals post hip fracture (male: 0.44, female: 0.57) (P < .05, except for male older individuals post hip fracture [P = .07]). Intraclass correlation coefficient values were poor to moderate in all populations (ie, healthy young individuals [0.41, 0.45], healthy older individuals [0.37, 0.41, 0.44], geriatric outpatients [0.54], and older individuals post hip fracture [0.54]). Bland-Altman analysis showed that within the same population of age and health status, agreement between HGS and KES varied on individual level.At both population and individual level, HGS and KES showed a low to moderate agreement independently of age and health status. HGS alone should not be assumed a proxy for overall muscle strength.
Adult, Male, geriatric assessment, Health Status, Ambulatory Care Facilities, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sex Factors, Predictive Value of Tests, Hyvinvoinnin tutkimuksen yhteisö, Humans, Muscle Strength, Geriatric Assessment, Aged, School of Wellbeing, Aged, 80 and over, Gerontologia ja kansanterveys, Hand Strength, Muscle strength, Hip Fractures, Gerontologian tutkimuskeskus, mittaus, Age Factors, ta3141, knee extension strength, Hospitals, aged; geriatric assessment; knee extension strength; Muscle strength; Nursing (all)2901 Nursing (miscellaneous); Health Policy; Geriatrics and Gerontology, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, SDG 1 - No Poverty, Female, Independent Living, Gerontology Research Center, Gerontology and Public Health, ikääntyneet, lihasvoima
Adult, Male, geriatric assessment, Health Status, Ambulatory Care Facilities, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sex Factors, Predictive Value of Tests, Hyvinvoinnin tutkimuksen yhteisö, Humans, Muscle Strength, Geriatric Assessment, Aged, School of Wellbeing, Aged, 80 and over, Gerontologia ja kansanterveys, Hand Strength, Muscle strength, Hip Fractures, Gerontologian tutkimuskeskus, mittaus, Age Factors, ta3141, knee extension strength, Hospitals, aged; geriatric assessment; knee extension strength; Muscle strength; Nursing (all)2901 Nursing (miscellaneous); Health Policy; Geriatrics and Gerontology, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, SDG 1 - No Poverty, Female, Independent Living, Gerontology Research Center, Gerontology and Public Health, ikääntyneet, lihasvoima
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 111 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
