
Abstract We study the efficacy of utilizing a powerful image descriptor, the curvelet transform, to learn a no-reference (NR) image quality assessment (IQA) model. A set of statistical features are extracted from a computed image curvelet representation, including the coordinates of the maxima of the log-histograms of the curvelet coefficients values, and the energy distributions of both orientation and scale in the curvelet domain. Our results indicate that these features are sensitive to the presence and severity of image distortion. Operating within a 2-stage framework of distortion classification followed by quality assessment, we train an image distortion and quality prediction engine using a support vector machine (SVM). The resulting algorithm, dubbed CurveletQA for short, was tested on the LIVE IQA database and compared to state-of-the-art NR/FR IQA algorithms. We found that CurveletQA correlates well with human subjective opinions of image quality, delivering performance that is competitive with popular full-reference (FR) IQA algorithms such as SSIM, and with top-performing NR IQA models. At the same time, CurveletQA has a relatively low complexity.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 144 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
