
handle: 11583/2490495
AbstractIn the present paper we provide a method to determine the load causing delamination along an interface in a composite structure. The method is based on the elastic interface model, according to which the interface is equivalent to a bed of linear elastic springs, and on Finite Fracture Mechanics, a crack propagation criterion recently proposed for homogeneous structures. The procedure outlined is general. Details are given for the pull–push shear test. For such geometry, the failure load is obtained and compared with the estimates provided by stress concentration analysis and Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics. It is seen that Finite Fracture Mechanics provides intermediate values. Furthermore, it is shown that the predictions provided by Finite Fracture Mechanics are almost coincident with the ones provided by the Cohesive Crack Model. As far as we are concerned with the determination of the failure load, the advantage of using Finite Fracture Mechanics with respect to the Cohesive Crack Model is evident, since a troublesome analysis of the softening taking place in the fracture process zone is not necessary. A final comparison with classical fracture criteria based on critical distances, such as the average stress criterion, concludes the paper.
Cohesive crack model, Materials Science(all), Elastic interfaces, Mechanics of Materials, Mechanical Engineering, Modelling and Simulation, Applied Mathematics, Finite Fracture Mechanics, Double lap joint, Condensed Matter Physics
Cohesive crack model, Materials Science(all), Elastic interfaces, Mechanics of Materials, Mechanical Engineering, Modelling and Simulation, Applied Mathematics, Finite Fracture Mechanics, Double lap joint, Condensed Matter Physics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 69 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
