
pmid: 26151498
There is substantial variability across individuals in the magnitudes of their skin conductance (SC) responses during the acquisition and extinction of conditioned fear. To manage this variability, subjects may be matched for demographic variables, such as age, gender and education. However, limited data exist addressing how much variability in conditioned SC responses is actually explained by these variables. The present study assessed the influence of age, gender and education on the SC responses of 222 subjects who underwent the same differential conditioning paradigm. The demographic variables were found to predict a small but significant amount of variability in conditioned responding during fear acquisition, but not fear extinction learning or extinction recall. A larger differential change in SC during acquisition was associated with more education. Older participants and women showed smaller differential SC during acquisition. Our findings support the need to consider age, gender and education when studying fear acquisition but not necessarily when examining fear extinction learning and recall. Variability in demographic factors across studies may partially explain the difficulty in reproducing some SC findings.
Adult, Male, Analysis of Variance, Adolescent, Psychometrics, Compulsive Personality Disorder, Conditioning, Classical, Age Factors, Fear, Galvanic Skin Response, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Schizophrenia, Educational Status, Humans, Regression Analysis, Female, Schizophrenic Psychology, Aged, Demography
Adult, Male, Analysis of Variance, Adolescent, Psychometrics, Compulsive Personality Disorder, Conditioning, Classical, Age Factors, Fear, Galvanic Skin Response, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Schizophrenia, Educational Status, Humans, Regression Analysis, Female, Schizophrenic Psychology, Aged, Demography
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
