
Although cardiac resynchronization therapy improves morbidity and mortality in patients with cardiomyopathy, heart failure, and electrical dyssynchrony, the rate of nonresponders using standard indications and implant techniques is still high. Optimal coronary sinus lead positioning is important to increase the chance of successful resynchronization. Patient factors such as cause of heart failure, type of dyssynchrony, scar burden, coronary sinus anatomy, and phrenic nerve capture may affect the efficacy of the therapy. Several modalities are under investigation. Alternative left ventricular lead implantation strategies are occasionally required when the transvenous route is not feasible or would result in a suboptimal lead position.
Heart Failure, Evidence-Based Medicine, Coronary Sinus, Electrodes, Implanted, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, Prosthesis Implantation, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left, Treatment Outcome, Humans, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices
Heart Failure, Evidence-Based Medicine, Coronary Sinus, Electrodes, Implanted, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, Prosthesis Implantation, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left, Treatment Outcome, Humans, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
