Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Geodermaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Geoderma
Article . 2017 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Controlling factors for the stability of subsoil carbon in a Dystric Cambisol

Authors: Patrick Wordell-Dietrich; Axel Don; Mirjam Helfrich;

Controlling factors for the stability of subsoil carbon in a Dystric Cambisol

Abstract

Abstract Subsoils store > 50 % of the total global soil organic carbon (SOC), and low SOC content and high mean residence times indicate that subsoils have the potential to sequester additional C on the long-term. Nevertheless, the mechanisms controlling the turnover of SOC in subsoils are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of temperature and substrate limitation on subsoil SOC turnover and evaluate the stability of additional C inputs in subsoils. In a 63-day microcosm incubation experiment, CO2 production of undisturbed soil samples from topsoil and two subsoil depth increments was measured at two different temperatures (10 °C and 20 °C). Additionally, 13C labeled root litter was added to the different samples and measurements of the isotopic signature of the respired CO2 allowed a differentiation between SOC mineralization and root mineralization. The CO2 production per unit soil mass was lower in deep subsoil than in the topsoil, but the CO2 production per unit SOC (specific mineralization) was three times higher in the deepest subsoil than in topsoil. This depth gradient of specific mineralization in undisturbed samples indicates that deep subsoil contained relatively more labile SOC than the topsoil. The temperature sensitivity of SOC mineralization expressed as Q10-q, decreased from around 3 to around 1 with increasing soil depth. In contrast, the mineralization of the added root material was solely determined by the recalcitrance of the added roots as indicated by a similar Q10-q through all three soil depths. Contrary to the SOC mineralization of undisturbed samples, significantly more added root litter was mineralized in the samples from the upper horizons than in the deepest subsoil samples, revealing a non-linear relationship between mineralization of added C and the SOC content. Thus, the distance between substrate units, as indicated by the SOC content, may be key factor for subsoil SOC dynamics. Moreover, root addition caused no positive priming effects in subsoil horizons indicating that enhanced C inputs to the subsoil can increase the SOC content and tap the unused C storage potential of subsoils.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    72
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
72
Top 1%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!