
Abstract Differences in fabric may explain why relationships between aggregate stability and soil color have never been reported for a relatively narrow-ranging population of soils. Therefore, three size fractions (1–2, 0.25–1, and 0.05–0.25 mm) of 25 topsoils (75 samples) from a Regosol–Umbrisol soilscape (Sierra Nevada, SE Spain) were characterized for fabric by scanning electron microscopy, aggregate stability by wet sieving, and CIELAB color (hab, L*, C*ab) by diffuse spectral reflectance. A stability-index ranking from 0.17 to 0.98 paralleled a ranking of hab (88.5 to 66.1), L* (48.3 to 30.2), and C*ab (7.6 to 18.9): that is, the progressive increase in stability was related to increased soil redness, darkness, and chromaticity. The reason was an increase in binding agents such as clay, organic C, and free forms coating the surfaces of the aggregates. The values of the correlation coefficients (0.55 to 0.82), factor-analysis variances (73 to 88%), and multiple-regression coefficients (0.40 to 0.65) indicated, however, that much of the variability in stability cannot be statistically explained by color changes. Size fractions of soils with a similar binding-agent content did not significantly (P
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
