Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Geodermaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Geoderma
Article . 2005 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Stand composition affects soil quality in oak stands on reclaimed and natural sites

Authors: D. Mohr; M. Simon; W. Topp;

Stand composition affects soil quality in oak stands on reclaimed and natural sites

Abstract

Abstract In many afforested reclamation sites as well as in commercial forests naturally settled shrubs or trees (“non-target species”; NTS) are cut down to improve the growth of the target trees (TT). In afforested oak plantations ( Quercus robur ) of the Rhineland (Germany) the NTS broom ( Cytisus scoparius ) and birch ( Betula pendula ) can occur in high densities during the first decades of succession. Hazel ( Corylus avellana ) is a common shrub in the understory of commercial oak forests ( Quercus petraea ). We studied the influence of these NTS on selected physical, chemical and biotic soil properties in cultures of oak (TT). Soil samples taken under single oak trees were compared with samples taken under broom and birch at afforested reclamation sites of different age (2, 9, 13 years) and with samples taken under hazel in an 80-year-old oak forest. At initial stages of succession (2 years) all of the investigated soil properties indicated a higher soil quality under broom than under oak. However, the advantage of broom was less evident in a later stage of succession (9 years). Birch (13 years) and hazel (80 years) only improved soil chemical properties. The soil pH and the content of Mg 2+ were significantly higher under birch, the contents of Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ and PO 4 3− were significantly higher under hazel than under oak ( p =0.05). The results demonstrate that the selected NTS improve soil quality in afforested and commercial oak forests. This effect is pronounced under the influence of broom at initial stages of soil development.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    14
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
14
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!