Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Fungal Biologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Fungal Biology
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
Fungal Biology
Article . 2021
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Serendipity in the wrestle between Trichoderma and Metarhizium

Authors: Edgar Q.A. Medina; Ariel S. Oliveira; Humberto R. Medina; Drauzio E.N. Rangel;

Serendipity in the wrestle between Trichoderma and Metarhizium

Abstract

The fungal species Trichoderma is frequently found in soil antagonizing plant-pathogenic fungi as well as parasitizing plant-pathogenic nematodes. Metarhizium species are insect-pathogenic fungi that are used throughout the world to control agricultural insect pests. Here, we determine whether the antagonism (A) of Trichoderma atroviride to Metarhizium robertsii during growth and spore formation can impact the stress biology of M. robertsii conidia. Cultures of M. robertsii were either produced without exposure to T. atroviride (control) or in the presence of T. atroviride. M. robertsii was grown in dual culture with T. atroviride on potato dextrose agar (PDA) using the following treatments: 1) Trichoderma inoculated at the same time with Metarhizium (A0); 2) Trichoderma inoculated two days after the inoculation of Metarhizium (A2); 3) Trichoderma inoculated four days after Metarhizium (A4); 4) Trichoderma inoculated 6 d after Metarhizium (A6); 5) M. robertsii grown alone on PDA medium (control); and 6) M. robertsii grown alone on minimal medium (Czapek-Dox medium without sucrose) (MM). Germination of M. robertsii conidia from all six treatments was then assessed under osmotic, oxidative, UV-B, and thermal stress. M. robertsii conidia produced on MM were the most tolerant to all stress conditions. For all stress conditions, conidia from treatments A0 and A2 were not viable. For osmotic stress, conidia produced in treatment A4 were the most tolerant, followed by conidia from treatment A6, which were both more tolerant than the control. For oxidative stress, conidia produced in both A4 and A6 treatments were similarly tolerant and more tolerant than conidia produced in the control. For thermal stress, conidia produced in treatments A4, A6, and control (PDA) were similarly heat-tolerant. For UV-B stress, conidia produced in treatments A4 and A6 were equally tolerant and more tolerant than conidia produced in the control. The germination speed of conidia produced in all treatments, A0, A2, A4, and A6 was also tested. Conidia produced on MM germinated faster than the other treatments. Conidia produced in the A4 treatment were the second fastest, followed by conidia produced in treatment A6. Both A4 and A6 conidia germinated faster than conidia produced in the control treatment. Conidia produced in the treatments A0 and A2 did not germinate in 24 h. In summary, moderate levels of biotic stress from a fungal competitor or low-nutrient conditions can enhance the stress tolerance of M. robertsii conidia.

Keywords

Metarhizium, Hot Temperature, Time Factors, Osmotic Pressure, Hypocreales, Microbial Interactions, Spores, Fungal

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    20
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
20
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!