<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 26209831
To estimate the relative contribution of genetic influences and prevalence on endometriosis.Analysis of self-reported data from a nationwide population-based twin registry.Not applicable.A total of 28,370 women, female monozygotic (MZ) or dizygotic (DZ) twins, who participated in either of two surveys (1998-2002 or 2005-2006).None.Self-reported endometriosis, validated by medical records.A history of endometriosis was reported by 1,228 female twins. The probandwise concordance was 0.21 for MZ and 0.10 for DZ twins. Higher within-pair (tetrachoric) correlation was observed among MZ (0.47) compared with DZ (0.20) twins. The best-fitting model revealed a contribution of 47% by additive genetic factors and the remaining 53% attributed to unique environmental effects.Our findings suggest both genetic and unique (nonshared) environmental influences on the complex etiology of endometriosis and support the hypothesis that genes have a strong influence on phenotypic manifestations of endometriosis.
Adult, Models, Genetic, Endometriosis, Twins, Monozygotic, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Quantitative Trait, Heritable, Diseases in Twins, Twins, Dizygotic, Humans, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Aged
Adult, Models, Genetic, Endometriosis, Twins, Monozygotic, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Quantitative Trait, Heritable, Diseases in Twins, Twins, Dizygotic, Humans, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Aged
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 158 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |