
Traditional transformer models available in EMTP-like software packages are not capable of representing transformer behavior during a transient state, which includes high frequencies, since they usually do not adequately take into account the transformer resonant behavior caused by its highly complicated design. Therefore, more complex “Black box” models are developed. Those models can be established without any knowledge of transformer geometry, based on the fitting of the measured admittance matrix of the transformer versus frequency. Unfortunately, the measurement and exploitation of a transformer's admittance matrix are not straightforward. The existing fitting methods include solving a non-convex constrained problem. Hence, it is not always easy to find an optimal solution of the problem. The difficulties, which can arise when building a high frequency “Black box” transformer model, are described in this paper together with a comparison of the performance and fitting accuracy of different numerical packages.
passivity enforcement, transmitted overvoltages, Transformer modeling, “Black box”, fitting, EMTP-type, SemiDefinite Programming, FRA, Black box ; Fitting ; Passivity enforcement ; Semi-Definite Programming ; Transformer modeling ; Frequency response analyzer, admittance matrix, Frequency response analyzer, Passivity enforcement, Black box, Semi-Definite Programming, Fitting, transformer modelling
passivity enforcement, transmitted overvoltages, Transformer modeling, “Black box”, fitting, EMTP-type, SemiDefinite Programming, FRA, Black box ; Fitting ; Passivity enforcement ; Semi-Definite Programming ; Transformer modeling ; Frequency response analyzer, admittance matrix, Frequency response analyzer, Passivity enforcement, Black box, Semi-Definite Programming, Fitting, transformer modelling
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
