
Abstract Grain size distributions (GSD) of pyroclastic materials are the product of processes ranging from primary fragmentation efficiency to tephra transport. As such, a detailed description of their physical and chemical state can provide pivotal information regarding such processes. By constraining the GSD of volcanic deposits one can thereby deliver powerful constraints on the energetics and dynamics of eruptions. In order to do so we must distinguish between two primary controls: 1) fragmentation of magma to tephra, and 2) secondary transport-related processes (such as abrasion and comminution), within the conduit and until deposition of the particles. Variations in particle interactions in the conduit together with conduit geometry, may be major factors in modifying the GSD. As in all physicochemical processes, for eruptive dynamics an experimental basis is an essential element of calibration and quantification. Here, we have conducted the first experimental investigation linking fragmentation and ash production via the influence of 1) particle-componentry and particle-size, and 2) the conduit geometry (constricted versus unconstricted) on the GSD. Rapid decompression experiments with loose tephra material from the fall deposit of Pomici Principali eruption (10.3 ka, Campi Flegrei) have been conducted in an optically transparent setup that enables the optical monitoring of particle dynamics with a high-speed camera. The samples employed can be classified into two main groups; 1) pumices, and 2) dense clasts (including crystals, lava clasts and wall rock fragments). Our results indicate that 1) a conduit diameter constriction (simulating obstacles in the conduit walls) is likely to reduce the average diameter of individual clasts and increase the generation of ash (
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
