
AbstractIn a recent paper, probabilistic processes are used to generate Borel probability measures on topological spacesXthat are equipped with a representation in the sense of type‐2 theory of effectivity. This gives rise to a natural representation of the set of Borel probability measures onX. We compare this representation to a canonically constructed representation which encodes a Borel probability measure as a lower semicontinuous function from the open sets to the unit interval. We show that this canonical representation is admissible with respect to the weak topology on Borel probability measures. Moreover, we prove that for countably‐based topological spaces the representation via probabilistic processes is equivalent to the canonical representation and thus admissible with respect to the weak topology. (© 2007 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
Set functions and measures on topological spaces (regularity of measures, etc.), Theoretical Computer Science, measure theory, Higher-type and set recursion theory, type-2 theory of effectivity, Type 2 Theory of Effectivity, admissibility, probabilistic processes, Measure Theory, Probabilistic Processes, Admissible Representations, Theory of numerations, effectively presented structures, Constructive and recursive analysis, Computer Science(all)
Set functions and measures on topological spaces (regularity of measures, etc.), Theoretical Computer Science, measure theory, Higher-type and set recursion theory, type-2 theory of effectivity, Type 2 Theory of Effectivity, admissibility, probabilistic processes, Measure Theory, Probabilistic Processes, Admissible Representations, Theory of numerations, effectively presented structures, Constructive and recursive analysis, Computer Science(all)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
