
Affective polarization captures the extent to which citizens feel sympathy towardspartisan in-groups and antagonism towards partisan out-groups. This is comparativelyeasy to assess in two-party systems. This paper first discusses challengesin applying the concept to multiparty setting and then presents different ways ofmeasuring affective polarization using like-dislike scores, a widespread measure ofparty sympathy. Using data for 41 countries and 124 elections from four modulesof the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, I then show that affective polarizationadds to existing concepts as a way of understanding political participationand democratic orientations. Studying affective polarization outside the US couldtherefore have important consequences for our understanding of citizen perceptionsof politics as well as citizen behaviour.
Ideological polarization, 506014 Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, Political Science, Comparative Politics, Partisanship, Affective polarization, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 506014 Comparative politics, Negative partisanship
Ideological polarization, 506014 Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, Political Science, Comparative Politics, Partisanship, Affective polarization, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 506014 Comparative politics, Negative partisanship
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 370 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% |
