
arXiv: 1701.04605
Recent advances on overfitting Bayesian mixture models provide a solid and straightforward approach for inferring the underlying number of clusters and model parameters in heterogeneous datasets. The applicability of such a framework in clustering correlated high dimensional data is demonstrated. For this purpose an overfitting mixture of factor analyzers is introduced, assuming that the number of factors is fixed. A Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampler combined with a prior parallel tempering scheme is used to estimate the posterior distribution of model parameters. The optimal number of factors is estimated using information criteria. Identifiability issues related to the label switching problem are dealt by post-processing the simulated MCMC sample by relabelling algorithms. The method is benchmarked against state-of-the-art software for maximum likelihood estimation of mixtures of factor analyzers using an extensive simulation study. Finally, the applicability of the method is illustrated in publicly available data.
Computational Statistics and Data Analysis (to appear)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Classification and discrimination; cluster analysis (statistical aspects), MCMC, Bayesian inference, factor analysis, Factor analysis and principal components; correspondence analysis, Methodology (stat.ME), mixture models, Computational methods for problems pertaining to statistics, Statistics - Methodology, clustering
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Classification and discrimination; cluster analysis (statistical aspects), MCMC, Bayesian inference, factor analysis, Factor analysis and principal components; correspondence analysis, Methodology (stat.ME), mixture models, Computational methods for problems pertaining to statistics, Statistics - Methodology, clustering
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
