
arXiv: 1706.02563
While Jeffreys priors usually are well-defined for the parameters of mixtures of distributions, they are not available in closed form. Furthermore, they often are improper priors. Hence, they have never been used to draw inference on the mixture parameters. The implementation and the properties of Jeffreys priors in several mixture settings are studied. It is shown that the associated posterior distributions most often are improper. Nevertheless, the Jeffreys prior for the mixture weights conditionally on the parameters of the mixture components will be shown to have the property of conservativeness with respect to the number of components, in case of overfitted mixture and it can be therefore used as a default priors in this context.
arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1511.03145
Noninformative prior, FOS: Computer and information sciences, 330, improper prior, improper posterior, Bayesian inference, Bayesian analysis, Mathematics - Statistics Theory, Statistics Theory (math.ST), Dirichlet prior, labelswitching, Probabilités et mathématiques appliquées, 519, Methodology (stat.ME), mixture of distributions, FOS: Mathematics, QA, Computational methods for problems pertaining to statistics, Statistics - Methodology, noninformative prior
Noninformative prior, FOS: Computer and information sciences, 330, improper prior, improper posterior, Bayesian inference, Bayesian analysis, Mathematics - Statistics Theory, Statistics Theory (math.ST), Dirichlet prior, labelswitching, Probabilités et mathématiques appliquées, 519, Methodology (stat.ME), mixture of distributions, FOS: Mathematics, QA, Computational methods for problems pertaining to statistics, Statistics - Methodology, noninformative prior
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
