
Embedded in the paradigm of embodied cognition, the theory of sensorimotor contingencies (SMCs) proposes that motor actions and associated sensory stimulations are tied together by lawful relations termed SMCs. We aimed to investigate whether SMCs can be learned by means of sensory augmentation. Therefore we focused on related perceptual changes. Subjects trained for 7 weeks with the feelSpace belt mapping information of the magnetic north to vibrotactile stimulation around the waist. They experienced substantial changes in their space perception. The belt facilitated navigation and stimulated the usage of new navigation strategies. The belt's vibrating signal changed to a kind of spatial information over time while the belt's appeal and perceived usability increased. The belt also induced certain emotional states. Overall, the results show that learning new SMCs with this relatively small and usable device leads to profound perceptual and emotional changes, which are fully compatible with embodied theories of cognition.
Adult, Male, Time Factors, Usability, Subjective experiences, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Vibration, Article, Clothing, Young Adult, Sensory augmentation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Perceptual changes, Sensorimotor contingencies, Proprioception, Embodied cognition, Touch Perception, FeelSpace belt, Space Perception, Female, Perception, Hedonic qualities, Content analysis
Adult, Male, Time Factors, Usability, Subjective experiences, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Vibration, Article, Clothing, Young Adult, Sensory augmentation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Perceptual changes, Sensorimotor contingencies, Proprioception, Embodied cognition, Touch Perception, FeelSpace belt, Space Perception, Female, Perception, Hedonic qualities, Content analysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 68 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
