
handle: 11590/342275 , 11573/1151984
Abstract Optimization of the hysteretic damping capacity of carbon nanotube (CNT) nanocomposites is carried out via a differential evolution algorithm coupled with an ad hoc finite element implementation of a nonlinear 3D mesoscale theory. Such theory describes the hysteresis due to the shear stick-slip between the nanotubes and the polymer chains of the hosting matrix. The amount of energy dissipated through the CNT-matrix stick-slip depends on the nanocomposite constitutive parameters such as the elastic mismatch, the nanofiller content/distribution, and the CNT-matrix interfacial shear strength . The optimization problem seeks to determine the set of material parameters that can give rise to the best damping capacity of the nanocomposite. The objective function is defined as the area below the damping ratio curve versus the strain amplitude over the range of strains of interest. The results confirm that the genetic-type nanocomposite damping optimization making use of a sound mechanical model of the material response can be an effective design method providing the right mix of phases overcoming a costly error-and-trial approach to manufacturing and testing.
Carbon nanotube nanocompositeHysteretic damping optimizationInterfacial stick-slipDifferential evolution optimizationThree-dimensional model of hysteresis, Carbon nanotube nanocomposite; Differential evolution optimization; Hysteretic damping optimization; Interfacial stick-slip; Three-dimensional model of hysteresis; Ceramics and Composites; Civil and Structural Engineering
Carbon nanotube nanocompositeHysteretic damping optimizationInterfacial stick-slipDifferential evolution optimizationThree-dimensional model of hysteresis, Carbon nanotube nanocomposite; Differential evolution optimization; Hysteretic damping optimization; Interfacial stick-slip; Three-dimensional model of hysteresis; Ceramics and Composites; Civil and Structural Engineering
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
