
The Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (OCS) of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) predicts obsessive-compulsive disorder and is highly heritable. Latent class analysis (LCA) of the OCS was used to identify profiles within this 8-item scale and to examine heritability of those profiles. The LCA was performed on maternal CBCL reports of their 6- to 18-year-old children from 2 US nationally representative samples from 1989 (n = 2475, 50% male) and 1999 (n = 2029, 53% male) and from Dutch twins in the Netherlands Twin Registry at ages 7 (n = 10 194, 49.3% male), 10 (n = 6448, 48.1% male), and 12 (n = 3674, 48.6% male) years. The heritability of the resultant classes was estimated using odds ratios of twin membership across classes. A 4-class solution fitted all samples best. The resulting classes were a "No or Few Symptoms" class, a "Worries and Has to Be Perfect" class, a "Thought Problems" class, and an "OCS" class. Within-class odds ratios were higher than across-class odds ratios and were higher for monozygotic than dizygotic twins. We conclude that LCA identifies an OCS class and that class is highly heritable using across-twin comparisons.
Netherlands Twin Register (NTR), Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Adolescent, Twins, Monozygotic, Young Adult, Odds Ratio, Twins, Dizygotic, Humans, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Child, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Netherlands
Netherlands Twin Register (NTR), Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Adolescent, Twins, Monozygotic, Young Adult, Odds Ratio, Twins, Dizygotic, Humans, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Child, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Netherlands
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
