
Abstract The hydrogen oxidation chemistry constitutes the foundation of the kinetics of all carbon- and hydrogen-containing fuels. The validation of rate constants of hydrogen-related reactions can be complicated by uncertainties associated with experimental data caused by the high reactivity and diffusivity of hydrogen. In the present investigation accurate experimental data on flame propagation and extinction were determined for premixed and non-premixed hydrogen flames at pressures between p = 1 and 7 atm. The experiments were designed to sensitize the three-body H + O 2 + M → HO 2 + M reaction, whose rate is subject to notable uncertainty. This was achieved by increasing the pressure and by adding to the reactants H 2 O and CO 2 whose collision efficiencies are high compared to other species. In the present study, directly measured flame properties were compared against computed ones, in order to eliminate uncertainties associated with extrapolations, as is the case for laminar flame speeds. The measured extinction strain rates exhibit both a positive and negative dependence on pressure with and without weighting with the density, and this non-monotonic behavior is caused by the competition between the H + O 2 → O + OH and H + O 2 + M → HO 2 + M reactions as well as HO 2 kinetic pathways as pressure increases. The various kinetic models considered in this investigation did not reproduce equally well the non-premixed flame extinction data with added H 2 O. On the other hand, the predicted extinction strain rates were consistent between the various models in the case of added CO 2 . Finally, it was shown that the formulation of binary diffusion coefficient pairs including H–N 2 and H 2 –N 2 has a first order effect on the prediction of extinction strain rates of non-premixed H 2 flames.
Fuel Technology, Chemistry(all), Chemical Engineering(all), Energy Engineering and Power Technology, Physics and Astronomy(all)
Fuel Technology, Chemistry(all), Chemical Engineering(all), Energy Engineering and Power Technology, Physics and Astronomy(all)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 33 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
