Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Computers in Human B...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Computers in Human Behavior
Article . 2012 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
DBLP
Article . 2020
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Migrating from WCAG 1.0 to WCAG 2.0 – A comparative study based on Web Content Accessibility Guidelines in Taiwan

Authors: Shing-Han Li; David C. Yen; Wen-Hui Lu; Tsun-Lin Lin;

Migrating from WCAG 1.0 to WCAG 2.0 – A comparative study based on Web Content Accessibility Guidelines in Taiwan

Abstract

The primary purpose of this research was to explore a comparative analysis of the ''Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG)'' standard in Taiwan and the international WCAG standards (WCAG 1.0/WCAG 2.0). The WCAG in Taiwan was established by the Research, Development and Evaluation Commission (RDEC), Executive Yuan in 2002. The WCAG 1.0 was established by the Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI, an organization that created the Web Content Accessibility system) of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), and became a W3C standard on May 5, 1999. The WCAG 2.0 became a W3C standard on December 11, 2008. The WCAG in Taiwan was established based on the contents of the WCAG 1.0. However, as the WCAG 2.0 was announced in 2008, check standards based on the WCAG 1.0 were facing revision in all aspects. Therefore, this study aimed at analyzing and comparing the differences between the WCAG 2.0 and the WCAG standards in Taiwan. Utilizing ''human check'' based on the WCAG 2.0 standard, this study assessed disabilities-related websites conforming to the WCAG standard in Taiwan. Results suggested that migrating from WCAG in Taiwan (based on WCAG 1.0) to WCAG 2.0 does not require a full range revision of webpage design. Suggestions given to disabilities-related websites in Taiwan for developing and providing more complete web accessibility included: (1) websites without accessible design should directly follow the WCAG 2.0 standard in developing web accessibility; (2) future promotion of web accessibility should include all educational institutes and related associations/organizations. For future studies, the resource availability for the disabled and the government achievement in web accessibility after WCAG 2.0 is implemented in Taiwan are topics worth of investigation. Expert opinions and user feedbacks should be included to reflect the actual needs of people with disabilities.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    18
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
18
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!