
Most patients with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP), a rare genetic disorder of heterotopic ossification, have the same causative mutation in ACVR1, R206H. However, additional mutations within the ACVR1 BMP type I receptor have been identified in a small number of FOP cases, often in patients with disease of lesser or greater severity than occurs with R206H mutations. Genotype-phenotype correlations have been suggested in patients, resulting in classification of FOP mutations based on location within different receptor domains and structural modeling. However while each of the mutations induces increased signaling through the BMP-pSmad1/5/8 pathway, the molecular mechanisms underlying functional differences of these FOP variant receptors remained undetermined. We now demonstrate that FOP mutations within the ACVR1 receptor kinase domain are more sensitive to low levels of BMP than mutations in the ACVR1 GS domain. Our data additionally confirm responsiveness of cells with FOP ACVR1 mutations to both BMP and Activin A ligands. We also have determined that constructs with FOP ACVR1 mutations that are engineered without the ligand-binding domain retain increased BMP-pSmad1/5/8 pathway activation relative to wild-type ACVR1, supporting that the mutant receptors can function through ligand-independent mechanisms either directly through mutant ACVR1 or through indirect mechanisms.
Embryo, Nonmammalian, Myositis Ossificans, Mutation, Animals, Humans, RNA, Messenger, Activin Receptors, Type I, Signal Transduction
Embryo, Nonmammalian, Myositis Ossificans, Mutation, Animals, Humans, RNA, Messenger, Activin Receptors, Type I, Signal Transduction
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 37 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
