
It has long been claimed that a better understanding of human or social dimensions of environmental issues will improve conservation. The social sciences are one important means through which researchers and practitioners can attain that better understanding. Yet, a lack of awareness of the scope and uncertainty about the purpose of the conservation social sciences impedes the conservation community's effective engagement with the human dimensions. This paper examines the scope and purpose of eighteen subfields of classic, interdisciplinary and applied conservation social sciences and articulates ten distinct contributions that the social sciences can make to understanding and improving conservation. In brief, the conservation social sciences can be valuable to conservation for descriptive, diagnostic, disruptive, reflexive, generative, innovative, or instrumental reasons. This review and supporting materials provides a succinct yet comprehensive reference for conservation scientists and practitioners. We contend that the social sciences can help facilitate conservation policies, actions and outcomes that are more legitimate, salient, robust and effective.
Environmental social science, Environmental management, Conservation biology, MarXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, Conservation social science, 333, Conservation science, Physical Sciences and Mathematics, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Environmental Studies, MarXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Environmental Studies, Environmental Sciences, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Human dimensions, Nature and Landscape Conservation
Environmental social science, Environmental management, Conservation biology, MarXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, Conservation social science, 333, Conservation science, Physical Sciences and Mathematics, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Environmental Studies, MarXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Environmental Studies, Environmental Sciences, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Human dimensions, Nature and Landscape Conservation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 995 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% |
