Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Applied Animal Behav...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Article . 2017 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

The effect of trough space and floor space on feeding and welfare of lambs in an intensive finishing system

Authors: Ellen C. Jongman; Maxine Rice; Angus J.D. Campbell; Kym L. Butler; Paul H. Hemsworth;

The effect of trough space and floor space on feeding and welfare of lambs in an intensive finishing system

Abstract

This study examined the effects of floor space and feeder space on the feeding behaviour, growth and stress physiology of lambs, at different times, over a 6-week period in a finishing feedlot. A total of 640 lambs in four time replicates (160 lambs per replicate) were studied in four 40-lamb intensive finishing systems (feedlots) for 6 weeks over a 16-month period. The lambs were Merino wethers with live weight at the commencement of the experiment of 28.3 (s.d. = 2.4) kg. The effects of two factors, pen floor space (2 and 5 m2/lamb) and feed trough space (4 and 10 cm/lamb) were examined in a factorial arrangement. Measurements taken on individual lambs during the experimental period included: feeding behaviour and displacements at the feeder in the feedlot during weeks 1, 2 and 6, lying behaviour during week 3, weekly live weights and cortisol concentrations in weeks 1 and 6. Weekly feed intake for each group of lambs was also record. Trough space of 4 cm compared to 10 cm per lamb reduced average lamb feed intake in all weeks of the 6-week period (a reduction of 1.2 (s.e. = 0.53) kg/hd in week 1, 1.3 (s.e. = 0.62) kg/hd in week 2, weekly average of 0.9 (s.e. = 0.17) kg/hd over weeks 3–6; P = 0.05, P = 0.06 and P = 0.0004, respectively). However, weight gain only differed significantly during the first week in the feedlot (average of 0.2 vs 1.1 (s.e.d. = 0.35) kg for 4 cm vs 10 cm/lamb of provided trough space, P = 0.03). At all observed times within the 6-week period, lambs with the reduced feed trough space spent less total time feeding (P < 0.05) with less feeding bouts (P < 0.05). There was no effect of feed trough space on lying time or cortisol concentrations. Floor space did not affect feeding and lying behaviour, feed intake, weight gain or cortisol concentrations. In conclusion, increasing feed trough space from 4 to 10 cm/lamb increased feed intake and live weight gain through an increase in the number of feeding bouts and the total time feeding. This indicates that the trough space recommendations in the Australian Model Code of Practice (sheep) of 2 cm/lamb are too low for maximum lamb feed intake and live weight. No effects of increasing floor space from 2 to 5 m2/lamb were found, however the growth rates in general were low suggesting that the environment in the feedlot may have been sub-optimal.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!