
pmid: 17157958
The number of food products containing extra or reduced levels of specific ingredients (e.g. extra calcium) that bring particular health benefits (e.g. stronger bones) is still increasing. Nutrition- and health-related (NH) claims promoting these ingredient levels and their health benefit differ in terms of the (legal) strength with which the claim is brought forward and the specific wording of the claim, both of which may differ between countries. Using a large-scale cross-national internet-based survey in Italy (n=1566), Germany (n=1620), UK (n=1560) and US (n=1621), the purpose of the study described here is to investigate consumer perceptions of NH food product claims, across different countries. NH claims are systematically varied as a function of six health benefits (cardiovascular disease, stress, infections, fatigue, overweight and concentration) and five claim types (content, structure-function, product, disease-risk reduction and marketing claim). The general results indicate that consumer perceptions differ substantially by country and benefit being claimed but much less by the claim type. Implications of these findings are being discussed.
Adult, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Male, knowledge, interpret, facts panel, Health Promotion, nutrient-content, information, Advertising, Food Labeling, Germany, Humans, Attention, Obesity, Fatigue, Internet, Data Collection, food-industry, Legislation, Food, Middle Aged, labeling regulations, Intestinal Diseases, Italy, Cardiovascular Diseases, impact, Female, Food, Organic
Adult, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Male, knowledge, interpret, facts panel, Health Promotion, nutrient-content, information, Advertising, Food Labeling, Germany, Humans, Attention, Obesity, Fatigue, Internet, Data Collection, food-industry, Legislation, Food, Middle Aged, labeling regulations, Intestinal Diseases, Italy, Cardiovascular Diseases, impact, Female, Food, Organic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 227 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
