Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Animal Reproduction ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Animal Reproduction Science
Article . 2016 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The efficiency of new CIDR and once-used CIDR to synchronize ovulation in primiparous and multiparous Holstein cows

Authors: Mahmoud S. El-Tarabany;

The efficiency of new CIDR and once-used CIDR to synchronize ovulation in primiparous and multiparous Holstein cows

Abstract

The objective of this study was to elucidate the efficiency of Ovsynch protocol, new (N-CIDRsynch) and once-used (U-CIDRsynch) controlled internal drug-release (CIDR) devices to synchronize the ovulation time of primiparous and multiparous Holstein cows. The current study was performed on a total of 2207 cows using three different synchronized groups. Conception [pregnancy per AI (P/AI) at day 28] and pregnancy (P/AI at day 75) rates using the N-CIDRsynch and U-CIDRsynch regimens (35.9% and 29.6%; 29.2% and 25.1%, respectively) were significantly greater than those in the Ovsynch group [Odds ratio (OR)=1.88 and 1.44; 1.92 and 1.52, respectively]. Embryonic loss rate did not differ significantly (P>0.05) among the Ovsynch, N-CIDRsynch and U-CIDRsynch regimens. In primiparous cows, no significant differences were found in conception and pregnancy rates between the U-CIDRsynch and N-CIDRsynch groups (OR=0.95 and 1.12; p=0.693 and 0.451, respectively). In multiparous cows, conception and pregnancy rates in the N-CIDRsynch group were significantly greater than those observed in the U-CIDRsynch group (OR=0.66 and 0.71; p=0.016 and 0.027, respectively) and embryonic loss rate in multiparous cows was lower for the U-CIDRsynch treatment than for the N-CIDRsynch treated cows (COR=0.58; p=0.048). The present study indicates that the use of a progesterone device in a synchronization protocol may improve fertility in dairy cows compared to the Ovsynch treatment. The use of U-CIDRsynch regimen may achieve satisfactory fertility results compared to those reported with N-CIDRsynch in primiparous Holstein cows.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Ovulation, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Pregnancy Rate, Ovulation Induction, Pregnancy, Delayed-Action Preparations, Animals, Cattle, Female, Estrus Synchronization, Insemination, Artificial, Progesterone

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Average
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!