Hyers–Ulam stability of Sahoo–Riedel’s point
Copyright policy ) F. Ye; S. Xu; W. Lee;
Hyers–Ulam stability of Sahoo–Riedel’s point
AbstractIn this paper, we construct a counter example to show that “Theorem” of Hyers–Ulam Stability of Flett’s Point in [M. Das, T. Riedel, P.K. Sahoo, Hyers-Ulam stability of Flett’s points, Applied Mathematics Letters. 16 (3) (2003), 269–271] is incorrect. At the same time, we give the correct theorem and generalize it.
- Shijiazhuang Tiedao University China (People's Republic of)
- East China University of Science and Technology China (People's Republic of)
- North China University of Science and Technology China (People's Republic of)
Hyers–Ulam stability, Sahoo–Riedel’s point, Applied Mathematics, Flett’s point
Hyers–Ulam stability, Sahoo–Riedel’s point, Applied Mathematics, Flett’s point
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).8 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
citations
Citations provided by BIP!
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
Citations provided by BIP!popularityPopularity provided by BIP!
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
Popularity provided by BIP! 8
Average
Top 10%
Average
hybrid
Fields of Science