
pmid: 17869202
The sequential flanker task was developed to study sequential performance using methodology borrowed from studies of task switching. We investigated age differences in backward inhibition [BI: Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26] during a sequential category search task. Participants learned four animal categories in a fixed order, and then searched for exemplars from those categories in runs of mis-ordered exemplars. Across three experiments, we observed robust BI facilitation effects. However, the magnitude of BI effects did not differ across age groups. This age-invariance held despite manipulations of distractibility (Experiment 2), and interstimulus interval (Experiment 3), suggesting that BI processes may be relatively automatic and obligatory in the context of sequential tasks. The findings are discussed in terms of the attentional mechanisms that underlie task set switching and sequential performance.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Time Factors, Age Factors, Reversal Learning, Middle Aged, Discrimination Learning, Inhibition, Psychological, Random Allocation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reaction Time, Set, Psychology, Humans, Attention, Psychomotor Performance, Aged
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Time Factors, Age Factors, Reversal Learning, Middle Aged, Discrimination Learning, Inhibition, Psychological, Random Allocation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reaction Time, Set, Psychology, Humans, Attention, Psychomotor Performance, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
