For optimal timing of liver transplantation and for the evaluation of new pharmacotherapeutic options, objective modalities for estimating the liver's functional reserve and prognosis in an individual patient are highly desirable. In the past a number of tests and several scoring systems have been proposed and validated to varying degrees for this purpose. The issues still to be clarified include: (1) any observed prognostic value of individual quantitative function tests and of scoring systems must be validated in independent, large enough and well defined patient populations; (2) it must be prospectively defined which (serially performed) quantitative test(s) add(s) prognostic information for the individual patient to the survival estimates defined by the more universally available scores and in which disease state(s); and (3) existing scoring systems must be validated, or new ones developed, that allow follow-up data to be used in order to adapt the original prognosis estimate to the evolution of the disease, e.g. during therapy.