
A random permutation model appropriate to two-stage cluster sampling is presented and the optimal model-unbiased (prediction) estimator of a finite population mean is obtained. The prediction estimator is compared, in an empirical study with a variety of real populations, to the classical estimator used in PPS (probability proportional to size) sampling of the clusters. The study has shown that the prediction estimator may be only marginally better, in terms of efficiency, than the classical estimator in PPS sampling. The special cases of stratified sampling and uni-stage cluster sampling are also studied.
relative efficiency, two-stage cluster sampling, finite population mean, stratified sampling, optimal model-unbiased (prediction) estimator, empirical study, probability proportional to size, PPS sampling, random permutation model, Sampling theory, sample surveys, Nonparametric estimation
relative efficiency, two-stage cluster sampling, finite population mean, stratified sampling, optimal model-unbiased (prediction) estimator, empirical study, probability proportional to size, PPS sampling, random permutation model, Sampling theory, sample surveys, Nonparametric estimation
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
