
pmid: 8085920
A recently developed abdominal muscle test (AMT), using four levels of difficulty to assess abdominal muscle strength, was validated by examination of the functional interrelationship between the individual muscles during the AMT, and by determining the relationship between the AMT level of difficulty and electromyographical (EMG) activity. EMG data were collected from the upper and lower rectus abdominis, and the external and internal oblique in 22 subjects as they participated in the AMT. Typically, throughout the AMT, lower rectus abdominis was most active, followed by upper rectus abdominis, external oblique, and internal oblique. EMG activity increased significantly (p < .05) for all muscles from Levels 1 to 3. At Level 4, although upper and lower rectus abdominis remained more active than the obliques, the relative contribution from the obliques was increased. The results of this study show that the AMT is a valid indicator of ability to develop voluntary abdominal muscle tension in Levels 1 to 3, although, Level 4 is more indicative of the oblique muscles' functional abilities and therefore may be considered a distinctly different muscle test.
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Electromyography, Reproducibility of Results, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Isometric Contraction, Medicine and Health Sciences, Humans, Female, Knee, Range of Motion, Articular, Abdominal Muscles
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Electromyography, Reproducibility of Results, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Isometric Contraction, Medicine and Health Sciences, Humans, Female, Knee, Range of Motion, Articular, Abdominal Muscles
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 47 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
