
handle: 11104/0211194
We apply classical proof complexity ideas to transfer lengths-of-proofs lower bounds for a propositional proof system P into examples of hard unsatisfiable formulas for a class Alg(P) of SAT algorithms determined by P. The class Alg(P) contains those algorithms M for which P proves in polynomial size tautologies expressing the soundness of M. For example, the class Alg(F"d) determined by a depth d Frege system contains the commonly considered enhancements of DPLL (even for small d). Exponential lower bounds are known for all F"d. Such results can be interpreted as a form of consistency of P NP. Further we show how the soundness statements can be used to find hard satisfiable instances, if they exist.
computational complexity
computational complexity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 30 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
