<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
handle: 10419/52452 , 10419/52417
This paper examines empirically whether governments behave strategically when setting corporate tax rates and tax bases, and—if so—how they react to changes in other countries’ tax rates and bases. Specifically, we estimate the slopes of tax policy reaction functions and examine how marginal changes in trade costs and GDP affect tax policies in the Nash equilibrium. The estimated slopes and comparative static effects can be rationalized in a model in which governments compete for foreign direct investment (FDI). Using estimated policy reaction functions, we demonstrate that observed changes in corporate tax systems are consistent with tougher competition for FDI following regional trade integration.
regional integration, ddc:330, multinational firms, corporate taxes; tax competition; foreign direct investment; multinational firms; free-trade areas; regional integration, F15, H25, foreign direct investment, corporate taxes, H20, free-trade areas, F23, tax competition, corporate taxes, tax competition, foreign direct investment, multinational firms, free-trade areas, regional integration, jel: jel:H20, jel: jel:F23, jel: jel:F15, jel: jel:H25
regional integration, ddc:330, multinational firms, corporate taxes; tax competition; foreign direct investment; multinational firms; free-trade areas; regional integration, F15, H25, foreign direct investment, corporate taxes, H20, free-trade areas, F23, tax competition, corporate taxes, tax competition, foreign direct investment, multinational firms, free-trade areas, regional integration, jel: jel:H20, jel: jel:F23, jel: jel:F15, jel: jel:H25
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 34 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |