
arXiv: 1802.07534
Given the success of Douglas--Rachford splitting (DRS), it is natural to ask whether DRS can be generalized. Are there other 2 operator resolvent-splittings sharing the favorable properties of DRS? Can DRS be generalized to 3 operators? This work presents the answers: no and no. In a certain sense, DRS is the unique 2 operator resolvent-splitting, and generalizing DRS to 3 operators is impossible without lifting, where lifting roughly corresponds to enlarging the problem size. The impossibility result further raises a question. How much lifting is necessary to generalize DRS to 3 operators? This work presents the answer by providing a novel 3 operator resolvent-splitting with provably minimal lifting that directly generalizes DRS.
Published in Mathematical Programming (updated version with corrected typo)
first-order methods, Numerical optimization and variational techniques, Convex programming, splitting methods, Numerical methods involving duality, lower bounds, Iterative procedures involving nonlinear operators, Optimization and Control (math.OC), Douglas-Rachford splitting, Optimization and Control, FOS: Mathematics, Contraction-type mappings, nonexpansive mappings, \(A\)-proper mappings, etc., maximal monotone operators, Monotone operators and generalizations
first-order methods, Numerical optimization and variational techniques, Convex programming, splitting methods, Numerical methods involving duality, lower bounds, Iterative procedures involving nonlinear operators, Optimization and Control (math.OC), Douglas-Rachford splitting, Optimization and Control, FOS: Mathematics, Contraction-type mappings, nonexpansive mappings, \(A\)-proper mappings, etc., maximal monotone operators, Monotone operators and generalizations
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 36 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
