
handle: 11573/15730
The authors are motivated by the goal of characterizing the topological characteristics of level sets of Sobolev functions that are preserved under weak limits. For example, they prove the following: If \(m>0\), \(\Omega\subset {\mathbb R}^2\) is open and bounded, \(g:{\mathbb R}\to{\mathbb R}\) is monotone increasing and left continuous with \(g=0\) on \((-\infty,0]\) and \(g>0\) on \((0,\infty)\), then \[ \begin{aligned} H^1_0(\Omega)&\cap C({\mathbb R}^2) \cap \Big\{ u : u\geq 0,\;\{u\leq t\} \text{\;and\;} \{u>t\} \text{\;are connected for\;}t\geq 0\Big\} \\ &\cap \Big\{u: \text{max} u =m,\;|\{u>t\}|\geq g(m-t) \text{\;for\;}t\geq 0\Big\} \end{aligned} \] is weakly closed in \(H_0^1(\Omega)\). This result can be applied to variational problems. In particular, the authors apply it to the problem of minimizing the Dirichlet integral in \[ H^1_0(\Omega)\cap C({\mathbb R}^2) \cap \Big\{ u : u\geq 0,\;\{u\leq t\} \text{\;and\;} \{u>t\} \text{\;are connected for\;}t\geq 0\Big\} \] among functions constrained to have a given decreasing rearrangement. Additional results and applications extending those described above are given. These are based on decompositions of Sobolev functions in the form \(\sum_{i=1}^{N}f_i(u_i)\) with the \(f_i\) Lipschitzian and the \(u_i\) chosen from spaces such as those above.
decreasing rearrangement, Optimization of shapes other than minimal surfaces, Methods involving semicontinuity and convergence; relaxation, minimization, Sobolev functions, Sobolev space, topological rearrangement, Dirichlet integral
decreasing rearrangement, Optimization of shapes other than minimal surfaces, Methods involving semicontinuity and convergence; relaxation, minimization, Sobolev functions, Sobolev space, topological rearrangement, Dirichlet integral
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
